How modern enterprises can leverage both Identity and Access Management (IAM) and Identity Governance and Administration (IGA) to create a comprehensive security framework
The rapid proliferation of SaaS applications has fundamentally transformed how organizations manage identity and access. With the average enterprise now using over 130 SaaS applications, traditional approaches to identity management are no longer sufficient. This explosion of cloud services has created a complex web of access points, each representing a potential security vulnerability if not properly managed.
For IT directors and security leaders, understanding the distinctions between Identity and Access Management (IAM) and Identity Governance and Administration (IGA) has become essential. While these terms are sometimes used interchangeably, they represent different yet complementary approaches to securing your SaaS ecosystem.
In this comprehensive guide, we'll explore the critical differences between IAM and IGA, examine how they address different aspects of SaaS security, and provide practical guidance on leveraging both approaches to create a robust security framework for your organization's growing cloud ecosystem.
Identity and Access Management (IAM) serves as the foundation of SaaS security, focusing primarily on the day-to-day management of digital identities and their access to resources. In the SaaS context, IAM is the gatekeeper that ensures the right users have the right access to the right applications at the right time.
At its core, IAM is concerned with three fundamental questions:
As organizations rapidly adopt more SaaS applications, traditional perimeter-based security becomes increasingly ineffective. The security boundary has shifted from the network to identity itself, making IAM the new security perimeter in cloud-first environments.
IAM systems provide several essential capabilities that form the backbone of SaaS security:
Authentication Management: Modern IAM solutions implement robust authentication mechanisms beyond simple passwords, including multi-factor authentication (MFA), single sign-on (SSO) capabilities, passwordless authentication options, biometric verification, and risk-based authentication that adapts based on user behavior and context.
Authorization and Access Control: Once a user's identity is verified, IAM systems determine what resources they can access through role-based access control (RBAC), attribute-based access control (ABAC), just-in-time access provisioning, context-aware access policies, and least privilege enforcement.
Directory Services: IAM systems maintain a central repository of user identities, including employee information and attributes, contractor and partner identities, service accounts, customer identities (for B2B/B2C applications), and device identities.
Federation and SSO: Critical for SaaS environments, these capabilities allow seamless authentication across multiple applications, reduced password fatigue, consistent security policies across the application portfolio, simplified user experience, and centralized access revocation.
According to Gartner, organizations that implement robust IAM solutions can reduce their identity-related security incidents by up to 50% while significantly improving user experience.
Despite its critical importance, implementing effective IAM in today's SaaS-heavy environments presents several significant challenges:
SaaS Proliferation: With a majority of business applications now SaaS-based, organizations struggle to maintain visibility and control across their entire application portfolio. Shadow IT—applications adopted without IT oversight—compounds this challenge, creating blind spots in the security perimeter.
Identity Sprawl: Users often accumulate excessive access rights over time, a phenomenon known as "privilege creep." Research shows that the average employee has access to significantly more applications than they regularly use, creating unnecessary security exposure.
Complex Multi-Cloud Environments: Most enterprises now operate across multiple cloud providers, each with its own identity models and access control mechanisms. Harmonizing these disparate systems into a cohesive security framework requires sophisticated integration capabilities.
These challenges highlight the limitations of traditional IAM approaches and point to the need for more comprehensive governance capabilities.
Identity Governance and Administration (IGA) represents the evolution of identity management beyond the core authentication and access control functions of IAM. While IAM focuses primarily on operational aspects of identity management, IGA adds a critical governance layer that addresses compliance, risk management, and the complete identity lifecycle.
IGA emerged as organizations recognized that simply controlling access wasn't sufficient—they needed comprehensive oversight of who has access to what, why they have that access, and whether that access remains appropriate over time.
For SaaS-heavy organizations, IGA provides the visibility and control needed to manage identities across dozens or even hundreds of cloud applications. It transforms identity management from a tactical security function to a strategic business capability that supports compliance objectives, reduces risk, and improves operational efficiency.
IGA solutions encompass several key capabilities that extend beyond traditional IAM:
User Lifecycle Management: IGA provides comprehensive management of identities throughout their entire lifecycle, including automated provisioning based on HR events, systematic deprovisioning when employees leave, role transitions that trigger appropriate access changes, self-service access requests with multi-level approval workflows, and temporary access provisioning with automatic expiration.
Access Certification and Reviews: Regular validation that access rights remain appropriate through scheduled access reviews, event-triggered reviews after organizational changes, risk-based certification that prioritizes sensitive systems, segregation of duties enforcement, and delegated reviews to appropriate business owners.
Role Management: Structured approach to organizing and assigning access rights including role mining and discovery, role engineering and design, role-based access models, business role management, and technical role implementation.
Policy Administration and Enforcement: Consistent application of security policies through centralized policy definition, automated policy enforcement, policy simulation and impact analysis, continuous policy monitoring, and exception management with appropriate approvals.
Identity Analytics and Intelligence: Advanced insights into identity-related risks including anomaly detection for unusual access patterns, peer group analysis to identify outliers, risk scoring for identities and entitlements, predictive analytics for potential security issues, and comprehensive reporting for security and compliance.
Modern SaaS management platforms like Josys support these IGA functions by enforcing periodic access reviews and helping identify anomalies, which has become a best practice for SaaS security. This capability is particularly valuable given the challenge of manually reviewing access across dozens of applications—a task that becomes increasingly unmanageable as the SaaS portfolio grows.
IGA plays a crucial role in meeting regulatory requirements and demonstrating compliance with industry standards. Organizations in regulated industries face regular audits that scrutinize access controls, and IGA provides the necessary evidence to satisfy these requirements.
Regulatory Compliance: IGA helps organizations meet requirements from regulations such as Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX), HIPAA, GDPR, PCI DSS, and FISMA by maintaining comprehensive records that demonstrate compliance, including who approved specific access rights, when access was granted or revoked, historical access patterns and changes, completed certification campaigns, and policy exceptions with their justifications.
Risk Reduction: By implementing proper governance, organizations can significantly reduce security risks by minimizing orphaned accounts from incomplete offboarding, preventing toxic combinations of access that could enable fraud, identifying excessive privileges before they can be exploited, ensuring timely access revocation when employees change roles, and maintaining appropriate separation of duties.
While IAM and IGA are complementary, they serve distinct purposes in securing SaaS environments. Understanding these differences is crucial for organizations developing a comprehensive identity security strategy.
Operational vs. Strategic Focus: IAM primarily addresses day-to-day operational needs, focusing on authentication, authorization, and access control. It answers the question: "How do we securely manage access right now?" IGA, by contrast, takes a more strategic view, addressing governance, compliance, and risk management. It answers: "How do we ensure access remains appropriate over time and meets our compliance requirements?"
Reactive vs. Proactive Approach: Traditional IAM tends to be reactive, responding to access requests and authentication events as they occur. IGA adopts a more proactive stance, implementing preventive controls, conducting regular reviews, and anticipating potential issues before they arise.
Depth of Integration: In SaaS environments, the integration depth differs significantly. IAM typically focuses on authentication integration (SSO), basic authorization, directory synchronization, and password management. IGA extends this with deep entitlement management within applications, fine-grained role and permission mapping, attribute-based access policies, complex approval workflows, and integration with HR systems for lifecycle events.
Lifecycle Management Capabilities: IAM provides basic provisioning and deprovisioning, self-service password resets, and account creation and deletion. IGA delivers comprehensive lifecycle governance including automated joiner-mover-leaver processes, role transitions and access adjustments, temporary and emergency access management, access certification and periodic reviews, and historical access tracking and audit trails.
Risk Management Approach: IAM typically addresses authentication risks through MFA and adaptive authentication, basic access control risks, and password-related vulnerabilities. IGA provides sophisticated risk management including access risk scoring and prioritization, segregation of duties enforcement, toxic access combination prevention, risk-based certification campaigns, and anomaly detection and outlier analysis.
Reporting and Analytics: IAM reporting typically covers authentication events and failures, access request tracking, basic usage statistics, and simple compliance reports. IGA delivers comprehensive analytics including detailed compliance reporting, access certification status and results, risk dashboards and trend analysis, role mining and optimization insights, and policy violation tracking and remediation.
Automation Capabilities: IAM typically automates authentication processes, basic provisioning workflows, and password resets and management. IGA provides advanced automation including complex approval workflows, risk-based access certifications, policy enforcement and remediation, role mining and recommendation, and compliance reporting and evidence collection.
Spend management tool Ramp notes that 50% of all software licenses go unused, costing companies $45 million per month in completely wasted software spend. IGA helps address this issue by ensuring access is appropriately provisioned, regularly reviewed, and promptly revoked when no longer needed.
To illustrate the power of combining IAM and IGA capabilities, let's examine how Mach49, an innovation consulting firm, successfully transformed their IT operations using an integrated approach.
As a rapidly growing consulting firm, Mach49 faced the typical challenges of SaaS sprawl and inefficient identity management:
Mach49 implemented Josys as their unified SaaS and identity management platform, combining both IAM and IGA capabilities in a single solution. This integration provided:
IAM Capabilities:
IGA Capabilities:
The implementation delivered impressive results across multiple dimensions:
Cost Savings:
Operational Efficiency:
Security and Compliance:
Strategic Impact:
Bobby Lalwani, IT Director at Mach49, summarized the impact: "Almost immediately, the platform delivered centralized SaaS visibility, automated key workflows, and uncovered significant cost-saving opportunities — up to 20% in monthly user expenses."
Mach49's success demonstrates several important principles for implementing integrated IAM and IGA:
Rather than viewing IAM and IGA as competing approaches, forward-thinking organizations like Mach49 recognize them as complementary components of a comprehensive identity security strategy. By integrating these capabilities, organizations can address both the operational and governance aspects of identity management across their SaaS ecosystem.
The most effective approach combines the strengths of both disciplines:
1. Comprehensive Security Coverage: Addressing both authentication/authorization needs and governance requirements creates a more complete security posture.
2. Streamlined Compliance: Automated governance processes reduce the manual effort required for compliance reporting while improving accuracy.
3. Reduced Risk: Combining strong authentication with proper governance significantly reduces the risk of inappropriate access and potential breaches.
4. Improved Operational Efficiency: Automation across both IAM and IGA functions reduces manual effort and accelerates processes like onboarding and offboarding.
5. Enhanced Visibility: A unified approach provides better visibility into who has access to what, why they have it, and whether that access remains appropriate.
According to industry research, organizations that implement both IAM and IGA solutions can reduce security incidents by up to 60% while improving operational efficiency by up to 40%.
Implementing an effective integrated strategy requires careful planning and execution. Based on industry experience and successful implementations like Mach49's, here are key recommendations:
1. Start with a Clear Identity Strategy
Before selecting specific tools, develop a comprehensive identity strategy that addresses current and future identity management needs, compliance requirements and regulatory obligations, security objectives and risk tolerance, operational efficiency goals, and user experience requirements.
2. Implement IAM Foundations First
Build a solid IAM foundation before adding governance capabilities by deploying robust authentication including MFA, implementing SSO across your SaaS portfolio, establishing basic provisioning workflows, creating a unified directory or identity store, and developing core access policies.
3. Add Governance Capabilities Incrementally
Rather than attempting to implement all IGA capabilities simultaneously, take an incremental approach by beginning with basic lifecycle management, adding access certification for critical applications, implementing role management for key business functions, developing compliance reporting for primary regulations, and gradually expanding to cover the entire application portfolio.
4. Prioritize Integration Between Systems
Ensure seamless integration between IAM and IGA components by establishing bidirectional data flows between systems, synchronizing identity information across platforms, creating consistent workflows that span both domains, implementing unified reporting and analytics, and developing a single source of truth for identity data.
5. Leverage Automation to Reduce Manual Effort
Automation is essential for scaling identity management across large SaaS portfolios. Modern platforms like Josys can automate provisioning based on HR events, implement automated access reviews and certifications, create self-service capabilities with appropriate approvals, develop automated remediation for policy violations, and use AI and machine learning for anomaly detection.
6. Maintain a Strong Focus on User Experience
Security and governance must be balanced with usability by creating intuitive interfaces for end users, simplifying approval workflows for managers, providing clear context for access certification decisions, developing mobile-friendly experiences for common tasks, and implementing just-in-time access for temporary needs.
7. Continuously Measure and Improve
Establish metrics to evaluate the effectiveness of your integrated approach including reduction in security incidents, time required for provisioning and deprovisioning, compliance reporting efficiency, user satisfaction with identity processes, and detection rate for inappropriate access.
Implementing an integrated IAM and IGA strategy is significantly easier with modern SaaS management platforms that combine both operational and governance capabilities. Platforms like Josys provide a unified approach that addresses the full spectrum of identity-related challenges:
Operational IAM Capabilities:
Strategic IGA Capabilities:
Integrated Benefits:
As SaaS adoption continues to accelerate, the distinction between IAM and IGA becomes increasingly important. Organizations that understand these differences and implement both capabilities—like Mach49 in our case study—will be better positioned to address the complex identity challenges of modern cloud environments.
The most successful approach recognizes that IAM and IGA are not competing alternatives but complementary components of a comprehensive identity strategy. By combining the operational focus of IAM with the governance capabilities of IGA, organizations can create a robust framework that enhances security, ensures compliance, and improves operational efficiency.
Key takeaways for IT directors and security leaders:
By implementing the best practices outlined in this guide and learning from successful implementations like Mach49's, you can develop an integrated approach that addresses both the day-to-day operational needs and the strategic governance requirements of your organization. This balanced strategy will help you navigate the complexities of identity management in today's SaaS-dominated landscape while preparing for the challenges of tomorrow.
The primary difference lies in their focus and scope. IAM concentrates on operational aspects—authentication, authorization, and basic access control. It answers "who can access what right now." IGA extends beyond these operational functions to address governance, compliance, and lifecycle management, answering "who should have access, why they have it, and whether that access remains appropriate over time."
IGA has become essential due to increasingly stringent regulatory requirements and the growing complexity of cloud environments. US regulations like SOX, HIPAA, and standards like PCI DSS require organizations to demonstrate proper access controls, regular access reviews, and appropriate segregation of duties—all core IGA functions. With the average enterprise using over 130 SaaS applications, manual governance becomes impossible, making IGA automation necessary for compliance at scale.
Organizations can implement IAM without IGA, especially in early stages of their identity management journey. However, using IGA without foundational IAM capabilities is generally impractical, as IGA builds upon the identity information and access controls that IAM provides. The most successful approach is implementing core IAM capabilities first, then gradually adding IGA functions as needs evolve and mature.
IAM focuses on basic provisioning and deprovisioning, typically handling account creation/deletion and password management with limited automation for role changes. IGA provides comprehensive lifecycle management including automated joiner-mover-leaver processes, role-based access adjustments, temporary access management, regular access certification, historical access records for audits, and deep integration with HR systems for lifecycle events.
Key factors include SaaS integration capabilities (number of pre-built connectors and depth of integration), scalability for your user population and application portfolio, governance capabilities (access certification, role management, policy enforcement), automation and AI features, compliance support for relevant regulations, deployment model flexibility, total cost of ownership, and user experience for both end users and administrators. Platforms like Josys that provide both IAM and IGA capabilities in a unified solution can offer significant advantages by eliminating integration complexity and providing a single source of truth for identity management.
Ready to Transform Your Identity Management?
Josys provides a comprehensive solution that combines powerful IAM capabilities with robust governance features, helping you secure your SaaS ecosystem while ensuring compliance. Our platform automates user lifecycle management, streamlines access reviews, and provides the visibility you need across your entire application portfolio.
Book a demo today to see how Josys can help you implement the integrated IAM and IGA strategy outlined in this guide, reducing security risks while improving operational efficiency.